Ref: AG3_006 / AG3_007
Description
This report has a summary and detailed mode and shows key dates and amount of down time for work orders where the job type is a ‘breakdown’ type job, that are not PPM jobs and that meet within the filter criteria.
Detailed
This shows a tabular list of all work orders meeting the filter criteria, grouped by equipment item with total down time for each work order.
The detailed report returns;
Equipment code
Equipment description
Site
Location
Work order number
Job description
Completion comments
Date/time occurred
Date/time reported
Date/time started
Date/time completed
Date/time online
Total downtime (minutes)
Summary
The summary report does not show any work order detail but provides for each equipment item a summary of totals, overall downtime and averaged totals.
The summary report returns;
Equipment code
Equipment description
Site
Location
Total numbers of jobs (against equipment)
Time difference occurred to reported
Time difference reported to started
Time difference started to completed
Time difference completed to online
Total downtime (for equipment item)
Operational Criteria
Results are returned based upon work order and equipment records matching one or more of the following selectable filter criteria. If no criteria are selected then all applicable records are returned.
• Work order start date range
o This will only include any work orders in the cost and time calculations that have been raised against the equipment item where the work orders start date is within the specified date range.
• Equipment filter
The results are also filtered automatically by job type. The report will include any jobs where the work order type has been marked as a breakdown type job in the work order type definition, within standing data. (Please refer to job types for more information).
(Standing data >> work orders >> work order type codes)
Average values are calculated by summing the time difference for each element and dividing by the number of jobs.
Aims
The report aims to provide the user with a performance analysis of how well breakdown type jobs are being handled and additionally the performance of equipment based upon the average amount of downtime.
Results Analysis
Ideally in this report the average times and amounts of downtime need to be low figures. Lower figures indicate better performance.